- STUFF FROM THE OLD MAYA 432 ORBITS, GREAT CYCLE PAGE
- Research Notes
READER BEWARE: This is ancient, low-priority material. Beyond the most certain of all facts, which is that Great Cycles are 432 orbits of Jupiter, I can no longer vouch for what is said on this page, at least not until I get a chance to revise it.
- 43,200 seconds in 12 hours
36.666 x 12 = 440 Hz
36 x 12 = 432 Hz
432 Hz – Unlocking The Magnificence Of The 3 6 9, The Key To The Universe
by Michael Lee Hill
STUFF FROM THE OLD MAYA 432 ORBITS, GREAT CYCLE PAGE
The Cycle of Time Number 432 by Joseph E. Mason
Cycles of Destruction
The explosion of Proto-Saturn at 9500 BC makes it clear that 108 orbits of Jupiter (or 108 x 11.8618 = 1281.0744 years) is the dominant cycle of destruction. I also think this is why the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar is primarily a vigesimal or base 20 numeral system. The are twenty 108 orbits of Jupiter cycles of destruction in the calendar (20 x 108 = 2160). Every Great Cycle is 432 orbits of Jupiter (or 432 x 11.8618 = 5124.2976 years). Speaking of years, it took me years of studying the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar until I discovered that the basic unit of measurement used in the calendar is orbits of Jupiter. And then it took me years more to uncover the underlying pattern of cycles of destruction, which are 36, 72, and 108 orbits of Jupiter. Only when all three of these occur in the same year is there a “Great Cycle.” Look carefully at the pattern of 36, 72, and 108 orbits of Jupiter cycles of destruction in the following snippet from the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar page:
This is the last Great Cycle. What you will notice is that 36, 72, and 108 orbits of Jupiter cycles of destruction also align in the middle of each Great Cycle. In other words, instead of there being only five of these alignments as there are five Great Cycles, there are actually ten. Why? Why are there not ten Great Cycles, one every 216 orbits of Jupiter? I have pondered the answer to this question for years now. One would naturally assume that something spectacular, such as a galactic superwave, occurs every 432 orbits of Jupiter, but the data does not support this assumption for the following reasons:
- BIRTH OF VENUS: I am very confident that the exact middle of the calendar, Great Cycle 2.5, marks the birth of Venus
- EXPLOSION OF PROTO-SATURN: The explosion of Proto-Saturn occurred at 108-9 (read as nine 108 orbits of Jupiter ago) when there was only an alignment with 36-27 (no 72)
- GALACTIC SUPERWAVES: The work of Paul A. LaViolette, PhD suggests that the galactic superwaves which apparently destabilized the polar configuration of the planets occurred roughly 216 orbits of Jupiter apart
So what is the answer? Why are there not ten Great Cycles? Well, if you are familiar with my work then you already know I do not like complicated answers. The truth is always simple. I think the designers of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar were doing exactly what the they claim, marking the end of the last world, which was the Biblical deluge that occurred in 3106 BC. This is exactly what the Old Testament of the Bible does. So does the Yuga calendar of India. I discuss this event below and in detail in The Biblical Deluge (3106 BC). This is primarily what makes 432 a sacred number. 3106 BC was 432 orbits of Jupiter ago.
December 21, 2012
+ 5.342634576179861 years (125.144606400000027 days) (4.111189434954009 months)
December 16, 2013
Great Cycle 5, The Great Tribulation
I am utterly astounded that the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar marked the end of the Modern Maximum. I have no patience for people who say that this calendar is no different than ours in the sense that at the end of a calendar year we just go to the store and buy a new one. The extra five years (the “Great Wayeb”) that must be added to it takes us to the beginning of a “grand solar minimum” that will make the Little Ice Age seem tame. It is going to destroy this world by earthquake, exactly as the Mayans predicted. Not in a day. The world goes on. Nothing can destroy this planet in one day and leave us as a species alive. The calendar is a “you live in the end time” marker for humanity. The December 21, 2018 date arrived at after adding five days (the clue) and five years (the “Great Wayeb”) is what I call the extended end date. I discovered the anti-cipher for this date only days before discovering that the Book of Daniel pointed to the exact same year. That moment is etched into my memory. I know exactly where I was standing at the time. The implication is that whoever wrote the Book of Daniel knew about the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar. The extended end date is discussed in The Great Wayeb (“y un poco”) and Its Anti-Cipher and most intriguingly in Leo Tanguma (DIA murals).
This date marks the end of the Mesoamerican (Mayan) Long Count calendar plus five days (the clue) and five years (the “Great Wayeb”). What will happen? The Bible says “for then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” The Mayans say this world ends because of earthquakes. It is clear from the Zodiac that the “Age of Aquarius” involves a weakening of the Sun resulting in an unprecedented influx of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) which are directly responsible for the worldwide flooding and increased lightning, seismic, and volcanic activity that is already happening to this planet. The implication is that our Solar system’s binary relationship with Sirius is ultimately responsible for the Sun’s “hibernation” or dormancy at this time during the misnamed “precession of the equinoxes.” There is an inverse relationship between solar output and GCRs. We are headed into uncharted territory.
Great Cycle 4, The Biblical Deluge (often discussed as “3200 BC”)
See “Were the Pyramids Built Before the Flood? (Masoretic Text vs. Original Hebrew)” by Nathan Hoffman (NathanH83) on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE
Great Cycle 3, Earth Assumes a new Solo orbit Around the Sun
EARTH ASSUMES A NEW ORBIT
Orphaned Earth assumes a new solo orbit around the Sun and the temperature record finally re-stabilizes.
Great Cycle 2.5, The Birth of Venus
VERY IMPORTANT POTENTIAL CONTRADICTION WI TALBOTT SEE 1:14:25 IN Symbols of an Alien Sky (Full Documentary)
HE HAS THE CENTER OF THE AZTEC CALENDAR STONE AS MARS
Marks the end of the Younger Dryas cooling
Interestingly, Randell Carlson in his YouTube lecture on the “Catastrophe at 12,900 BP” (a favorite subject of his), says “In the aftermath of this catastrophe, is when we find stepping onto the world stage the goddess…the age of the goddess when humans, the descendants of the survivors, are worshipping the Earth in the form of a corpulent pregnant goddess…” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbnrDbbfyxE) In a different YouTube interview (Joe Rogan Experience #725) with Graham Hancock & Randall Carlson, the date is moved to 12,800 BP, which is (1950 – 12800 =) 10,850 BC.
As with all Mesoamerican cultures, including the Mayans, the Aztecs inherited their calendar system from the original designers of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar. We do not know who these people were. However, the design doubtless dates back to 600-700 BC when, according to Jno Cook in his remarkable work Recovering the Lost World, “Mars caused a disturbance of the Earth’s orbit on February 26th, 747 BC,” changing the length of a year from 360 to 365.25 days. At this time the attention of perhaps some of the most advanced astronomers ever alive on this planet was focused on understanding the new configuration of the planets so familiar to us today. The similarities of the Aztec calendar system to that of the Mayans is simply too great for this to be otherwise.
For anyone familiar the work of David Talbott, that Miley Cyrus tongue sticking out of the face in the MIDDLE of the Aztec Sun (or Calendar) Stone featured on this website represents the planet Venus. This is actually profoundly important because it is an affirmation that at the center of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar (10,793 BC or Great Cycle 2.5) is the birth of Venus. How did I arrive at this conclusion?
- It is clear the birth of Venus preceded the explosion of Saturn because Venus is well documented to have been part of the polar configuration.
- Nothing less than the explosion of Proto-Saturn can account for the total destruction of 9500 BC
- Ergo the birth of Venus preceded the explosion of Proto-Saturn
This logic is so simple and straightforward, the only real question is when did the polar configuration break apart. For the answer to that we go full circle and look to the evidence of the giant skeletons being on or near the surface.
CUT N PASTE
If you look at my post on the basic structure of the so-called “Mayan” long count calendar and read all of my other stuff already posted (a tiny amount of the material I am sitting on), you will see that I am somewhat conflicted about what happened at two of the four main dates in the history of new solar system configuration, which began when the “Proto-Saturn” solar system configuration of the Electric Universe team destabilized and broke apart. Those dates are as follows:
END OF SECOND MAYAN AGE
The Proto-Saturn solar system configuration of the Electric universe team is destabilized interrupting a temperature cycle that is over 300,000 years old. Nothing will ever be the same.
10793 BC (Great Cycle 2.5)
BIRTH OF VENUS FROM SATURN (EU) marks the end of the “Younger Dryas cooling”
Saturn FINALLY explodes and orphans Earth. marks the end of the PLEISTOCENE and start of the Holocene epoch
END OF THIRD MAYAN AGE
Orphaned Earth assumes a new solo orbit around the Sun and the temperature record finally re-stabilizes (at least from a historical perspective). Venus and Mars become comets.
The dates themselves are not in question. The agree perfectly with the Greenland ice core temperature records. What I am not sure about is 9500 versus 10793 BC. One is Saturn exploding and the other is the birth of Venus. This is solvable though based on when the worship of Venus began, which is to say the way it is represented above is probably wrong. In either case, Earth was destroyed because it was bombarded with plasma resulting in a 30 degree tilt of the planet.
The Protruding Tongue (archetype)
But how can we be sure that Proto-Saturn exploded in 9500 BC and rained plasma down on the Earth? Only serious students of David Talbott can answer this question. One of the hundreds of “archetypes” (global patterns) he has discovered buried in mythology is the “Star of chaos: Protruding tongue” for the planet Venus. Venus is at the heart and soul of worldwide mythology. It is also at the center of the Aztec Sun (or Calendar) Stone. As discussed in Birth of Venus (Great Cycle 2.5), this is a reflection of the fact that the birth of Venus also marks the middle (Great Cycle 2.5) of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar.
For other examples of this archetype, see Birth of Venus (Great Cycle 2.5).
Great Cycle 2, Second Galactic Superwave
END OF SECOND MAYAN AGE
SECOND galactic superwave
The “Proto-Saturn” solar system configuration of the Electric universe team is destabilized
This event interrupts a heartbeat-like temperature cycle that has been stable for well over 300,000 years old. Nothing will ever be the same. Paul LaViolette places this date at 15,870 BP (13,920 BC), which in his book Earth Under Fire he gives as either 13,865 or 13,860 BC.
Great Cycle 1.5, First Galactic Superwave
FIRST galactic superwave
Paul LaViolette has Sagittarius shooting his arrow through the dead center of the Milky Way galaxy at 18,200 BP (16,250 BC). He believes this date or 15,870 BP (13,920 BC) is an either-or proposition, but both dates are within 500 years of a “Great Cycle” which could indicate that the galactic superwaves are recurring every 216 orbits of Jupiter (Plato’s number), which is one half of a “Great Cycle”. This would imply that yet another galactic superwave was responsible for the birth of Venus and possibly for Earth assuming its present orbit around the Sun after the proto-Saturn solar system of the Electric Universe team broke apart.
The Cycle of Time Number 432 by Joseph E. Mason