PAGE STATUS: This page is little more than an innovative way to organize “Space News” and other educational videos published by David Talbott of The Thunderbolts Project™ and Wallace Thornhill of the Electric Universe which discredit mainstream science, or “consensus science” as David Talbott sometimes calls it. Unfortunately, I never got around to finishing it. I will someday before the end of 2021. My use the adjective mathematically is a courtesy these people do not deserve. In truth, and in accord with the law of opposites, they live in an imaginary “Big Bang,” “Black Hole,” “Dark Matter” world that simply does not exist in reality. Mainstream “scientists” are to a man (or woman) mad, crazy, insane, delusional, intellectual sickopaths (not misspelled). However, they are legion, respected in society, earn good salaries, and live in nice houses. Who among us is willing to say the King has no clothes?
LAST UPDATE: December 11, 2020
Albert Einstein is the worst thing that has ever happen to mankind in the entire history of the Fifth World. The progeny of Jove know this, which is why they promote his work.
We live in an electromagnetic universe. Gravity is a secondary force and almost inconsequential in comparison to electromagnetism. Get some perspective.
EINSTEIN DISCARDED 99.99% OF THE PHYSICAL REALITY OF THE UNIVERSE by Jamal Saad A. Shrair
Oh my God! Et tu RT?
RT is one of my most trusted new sources. Here is the title of an article they posted on August 16, 2019:
Gulp! Scientists ‘detect black hole swallowing neutron star for first time’
Neither black holes nor neutron stars exist in reality, but you would never know this because, true to form for the mathematically insane, the article was accompanied by a very realistic looking picture of the non-existent phenomena.
Here the Cookie Monster is swallowing Darth Vader’s Death Star, only this isn’t a movie and no one bothered to label this picture as purely fantastical because you see, this is reality for the mathematically insane.
Now get ready to swallow something equally difficult for the average person. The entire intellectual construct of the world in which you live is based on a fallacy. “Mathematically insane” is harsh language, but it is nonetheless true. Albert Einstein is the god of the mathematically insane, which religion is symbolized by a man holding a piece of chalk and standing in front of a chalkboard full of inscrutable equations. I do not use the term “god” lightly. The simple truth is that there was no Big Bang, the universe is not expanding, there are no black holes, no neutron stars, no dark matter, no antimatter, and now no gravitational waves. There is no Oort cloud. The Sun is not a gigantic thermonuclear furnace. This list covers the full gamut of modern astronomy and cosmology. People toss around terms like “black holes” and “neutron stars” as if they were facts, not realizing they exist only in the minds of mathematicians who have evolved a convoluted mathematical construct that has no correspondence to reality. To make matters worse, these very same mathematicians produce realistic looking pictures, artist renditions, of what exists only in their imagination. Few of their fanciful notions seem more absurd to me than the idea that there is a giant black hole in the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. It is almost self-evident looking at spiral galaxies that at their center is a star factory, a fountain of life, not some imaginary Cookie Monster. Dr. Paul A. LaViolette refers to Sagittarius A* as our “Mother Star.” A very wise man once said “some things [are] hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest…unto their own destruction.” Everything these mathematicians say and do is based on an outdated, gravity-centric view of the universe, one invented by Albert Einstein that even he openly questioned before his death.
The truth is that we live in an electromagnetic universe.
FROM Gravity is Really Weak? by Jeff Vogtschaller of University of Wisconsin, Madison
In these lessons I send out to you all I throw out ideas such as: “gravity is really weak”. Well, what exactly do I mean by “really weak”? Is there a scale to all these ideas? …
Electromagnetism – the force we know best – is 10 to the 36th power stronger than gravity. That’s 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger! …
Would you like a real, mind boggling picture for [the difference between the forces of electromagnetism and gravity]? The diameter of the smallest atom , Hydrogen, is about 10 to the -10 power meters. The diameter of the entire universe is about 10 to the 26th power meters. So, the difference between the diameter of the smallest atom and the entire Universe is about 10 to the 36th power. Yup, that means that if you measured the gravitational attraction between the electron and proton in a Hydrogen atom it is about the same amount of force as the electromagnetic attraction of an electron and a proton at opposite sides of the Universe!!! If that doesn’t boggle your mind, your mind is unboggleable! Gravity is really weak!
Of course, mainstream science and academia misunderstand gravity also. Gravity is provably 20 billion times faster (that’s billion with a “b”) than the speed of light. It travels via the very same aether Sir Isaac Newton postulated light used. Master gravity and interstellar travel (think Star Trek) becomes a reality. See The Speed of Gravity (warp drive) for a full discussion of this subject. The analogy that Wallace Thornhill uses is a taut rope stretched between two points (such as in a tug-of-war). Whip the rope and it slowly undulates to the other end. This is the speed of light. But pull on it, and the force is immediately felt on the other end. This is the speed of gravity. By harnessing this knowledge, we can in fact travel faster than the speed of light and visit the stars at warp-like speeds.
Speed of Light
According to special relativity, [186,282 miles per second] is the maximum speed at which all conventional matter and hence all known forms of information in the universe can travel. —Wikipedia
The only meaningful comparison that can be made between the Electric Universe and plasma science versus the outdated, gravity-centric model of the modern scientific community (the mathematically insane) is that the latter (the status quo) is a new flat earth. I do not mean to belabor the point, but this mathematical insanity is not unlike believing that a handful of Muslims with box-cutters and a few hours of flight simulation training somehow managed to turn two of the tallest buildings in the world into dust. It is completely divorced from reality. What right do I have to call hundreds of thousands of our most respected citizens from mainstream science and academia all over the world mathematically insane? And please understand I use this term not judgmentally, but descriptively. They truly are mathematically insane. The answer to this question is found by following the links in the next section, but the more important question is, “Can we trust anything these people say?” The answer sadly is no. They are like an oversized anchor in the middle of a tempest. Ask them to weigh anchor and they will scream back at you through the howling wind and rain, “What storm?” The analogy is a good one because before this transition to a new era in science is complete, we will be forced to see these people for what they are, which is arrogant, pompous thinkers who value job security over innovative thought and who have abandoned traditional science for the imaginary world of mathematics where they are firmly entrenched. The King has no clothes. It is that simple. When I think about what mainstream science and academia did to Immanuel Velikovsky and their stubbornness in failing to recognize the simple brilliance of the men discussed in the next section (who base their work on a more traditional, observational science, not mathematics), I wish we could just throw them overboard before they get us all killed. Waking up to the reality that our mainstream scientists and academia are mathematical insane is a slow and difficult process. The trick is to remember that it is all mathematical equations, nothing else. No one has ever seen a black hole and no one ever will because they do not exist in reality.
There is another, deeper dimension to the problem of the mathematical insanity that grips mainstream science and academia. While the likes of David Talbott, Wallace Thornhill, and Walter Cruttenden are busy confronting the very same entrenched academia that tried in vain to destroy the work of Immanuel Velikovsky, fundamental questions go unanswered. Here it is important to grasp that once you accept the reality that the planets in our solar system were recently in an entirely different configuration than they are today (one David Talbott calls the Polar configuration, which is discussed in detail on the Catastrophism 101 page), everything changes. For example, ice core temperature data from the past must be seen in an entirely new light. Likewise, what to expect in the future with this new configuration of the planets radically changes. The only thing that does not change regarding catastrophic causes and effects are extrasolar influences.
- GALACTIC COSMIC RAYS (GCR): First among these unanswered questions is, now that earth is no longer in the protective magnetosphere of Proto-Saturn (the primordial sun), what are the implications for galactic cosmic rays (GCR)? Two suns protected us from GCRs in the past. Now only one does. It is clear from the Zodiac that earth undergoes significant changes during its 26,000 year binary dance with Sirius. If the Polar configuration broke apart a mere 5,200 years ago, we still have more than 20,000 years of experiencing those changes outside of Saturn’s protective magnetosphere for the very first time. Already in the last, extended solar minimum and so far in this Solar Cycle 24 we are seeing historically unprecedented levels of GCRs the consequences of which are worldwide flooding, extreme lightning, tornados, more frequent and violent hurricanes and typhoons, and increased seismic and volcanic activity. Is this about to get much worse?
- ICE CORES: Interpretation of ice core temperature data is not taking into consideration the end of the last world and the entirely new configuration of the planets. Milankovitch Cycles cannot be projected back in time to explain glaciation. They simply do not apply. The main question that arises from these considerations is what causes glaciation. Is it extrasolar? If not, there is no basis to assume past temperature records will have any bearing on the future whatsoever.
- 9500 BC: What happened in 9500 BC? I would expect there to be a significant change in the ice core temperature records when Proto-Saturn exploded after its encounter with Jupiter and the subsequent displacement of Saturn to its current vastly more distant orbit. Jno Cook and others within the field of comparative mythology think this happened in a timeframe that I generically refer to as 3100 BC, but there are dissenting opinions within The Thunderbolts Project™ and Electric Universe camps. Obviously, mainstream science and academia are useless in answering this profoundly important question. Uniformitarianism (or gradualism) does not recognize the reality of the Polar configuration of the planets. The wild temperature fluctuations around 9500 BC and the ice age (energy) paradox in particular at first seem to be a natural fit, but electromagnetic reconfigurations of small metal balls in plasma science laboratories suggest that such reconfigurations happen rapidly, not over thousands of years.
- GLOBAL WARMING: For anyone not buying the official line of global warming, the data is screaming at us that the exact opposite is true. The Sun is clearly entering into a period of dormancy (or hibernation, but I do not think “grand solar minimum” rises to the occasion). Could the Little Ice Age have been merely a precursor of what is to come?
- THE “MAYAN” CALENDAR: The end of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, which was actually December 16, 2013, perfectly marked the middle of Solar Cycle 24’s “double hump” maximum. If we are in fact headed into a new ice age which began on November 14, 2017, how did the designer’s of this calendar know to mark with such precision the end of the Modern Maximum?
Are these last two questions related? Did the designers of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar somehow know the Sun would enter into a period of dormancy at the end of this solar cycle? Solar activity and GCR’s have a well documented inverse relationship. With a quiet Sun comes more GCRs. Could we be headed into a period of hitherto unknown levels of GCRs—perhaps more than the planet has experienced in over a half million years—with all the attendant weather-related problems mentioned above: worldwide flooding, extreme lightning, tornadoes, more frequent and violent hurricanes and typhoons, and increased seismic and volcanic activity? Most people do not realize this is already happening because they only get news from mainstream media. How much worse can it get? GCRs are only now (24 Feb 2018) starting to climb again after stalling at around 6500 to 6700 for all of 2017 (as measured by the University of Oulu Cosmic Ray Station in Finland). I believe they will not only exceed Solar Cycle 23’s record breaking 6900 but go off the charts into unknown territory. The answer to these and many other questions are not mere academic exercises. They are vitally important for everyone alive today and for the future of mankind.
The Caltech team is seriously remiss (pun intended) in overlooking the work of the Sirius Research Group at the Binary Research Institute. It is well documented by the latter that what the CalTech team is seeing is the gravitational influence of the Sirius star system.
NO Planet Nine
Why indeed does the fabled “Planet Nine” have such a powerful effect? Is it not more likely that the elephant in the room (Sirius) is responsible for tilting the Sun? I am keenly aware of the work of Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown at CalTech regarding the existence of Planet Nine, but there is another reason for the alignment of the distant Kuiper Belt objects. As discussed by the Sirius Research Group at the Binary Research Institute, Sirius offers a more rationale explanation for this phenomenon. For an overview of this subject, read “What’s Tugging on our Solar System? Something Bigger Than a 9th Planet Gravity Waves May Be Key!” written by no less than Walter Cruttenden. (Unfortunately, Cruttenden is speaking outside of his area of expertise when assuming “gravitational waves” exist. They do not. See No Gravitational Waves for a discussion.)
Instead of talking about our solar system’s binary relationship with the Sirius star system attested to by the Dogon tribe of West Africa, what we hear about all the time is how Planet Nine (P9), Planet X (disproved by the CalTech team), Nibiru or the Twelfth Planet (based on the thoroughly discredited work of Zecharia Sitchin and the utterly ridiculous Seal VA 243), Wormwood (a metaphorical reference to a plant of the genus Artemisia mentioned once in Revelation), or whatever you want to call it is about to destroy earth. This is a train wreck of popular insanity. The only substance to it is the work of the CalTech team.
In fact, I find it a deplorable stealing of the limelight that Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown somehow completely missed this alternative explanation for the alignment of the distant Kuiper Belt objects, especially when you consider that they are gravitationally favoring the Sirius star system.
It is much more exciting to suggest that there is another planet in our solar system than to point out that the king has no clothes and the current outdated, gravity-centric model of reality is completely delusional.
There are only a handful of stars closer to earth than Sirius, but Sirius dwarfs them all in size. Equally important is the fact that Sirius, at a declination of -17° from the celestial equator (earth’s equator projected out into space), is roughly in the same plane as earth and our solar system. The Thunderbolts Project™ has produced a graphic that makes it clear Sirius is the “elephant in the room:”
Looking at this graphic and considering the phenomenal things happening to our solar system right now, how likely is it that these effects are the result of an imaginary Planet Nine when it is provable that our solar system is in a binary relationship with the Sirius star system? Free yourself from this nonsense. There is not enough time left for guessing. I do not pretend to know exactly where our solar system is in relationship to the Sirius star system, but with the rate of precession slowly increasing it is clear that the Sirius star system is getting closer to our solar system and therefore exerting an ever increasing gravitational influence. This is precisely what is disturbing our solar system. It is also most likely what is responsible for the cracks appearing all over our planet and for the massive increase in small asteroids (fireballs) entering our atmosphere. The gravitational influence of the Sirius star system would first be evidenced in the orbital disturbance of smaller rocks (asteroids and comets), but it will be eventually felt by the larger rocks in our solar system, including earth. The equally massive increase in seismic and volcanic activity is also thus explained. Finally, I am convinced this is why the Sun is growing weaker, which means that Sirius is ultimately responsible for the increase in galactic cosmic rays. The approach of the Sirius star system is the trigger mechanism for all of the disruptions we are witnessing even now on planet earth and throughout the solar system. It is as regular as clockwork. It is encoded in ancient artifacts such as the Zodiac and the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar. Ultimately it will cause an axial tilt that I believe for this planet is also as regular as clockwork.
NO Big Bang
The Real Crisis in Cosmology – The Big Bang Never Happened from the LPPFusion YouTube channel
NO Nebular Clouds
NO Black Holes (Plasmoids)
NO Neutron Stars
NO Dark Matter
The Sun is NOT a gigantic thermonuclear furnace
From The Watchers SHRAIRFUSION Model: The absolute empirical evidence of the physical reality of the Sun Posted by Jamal S. Shrair on
NO Gravitational Waves
Gravitational waves are the latest example of how mainstream science and academia are mathematically insane. We do not know what the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) is measuring, but it is not gravitational waves from two merging black holes. Black holes do not exist. Nevertheless, the following short YouTube is useful in explaining the LIGO’s equipment.
Here is what Wallace Thornhill has to say about the LIGO and the recent announcement of the “discovery” of gravitational waves.
These and other Nobel prize winners of the past have seriously warped our sense of reality. The public will have spent 1.1 billion dollars providing super-expensive gadgets to detect the grin of the cosmic Cheshire cat to mathematical gamers posing as physicists. Like the scientists wasting billions of euros on the Large Hadron collider to find the imaginary Higgs boson, they had to find something to save their credibility. —Wallace Thornhill
Here are two videos comprising Wallace Thronhill’s response the the most recent “gravitational waves” madness:
Between LIGO and P9, CalTech is batting zero
My God, the world we live in.