№ 5. The Apollo astronauts never left low Earth orbit

So long as this message is in place, I have yet to disclose my real irrefutable evidence that the Apollo program never left low-Earth orbit, but for no other reason that I am busy writing other stuff. This proof consists of conflicting statements made by the astronauts themselves during the Apollo 11 post-flight inteview. 

PAGE STATUS: I never quite stop working on this page. It is like a hobby for me because I am transfixed by the level of mass mesmerism involved. The Apollo program is the biggest lie in the history of mankind after uniformitarianism (or gradualism). An unexpected and convincing exposure of this lie to a large segment of society would be highly problematic for the progeny of Jove. The stakes are very high in that sense, no less so today than half a century ago. Hence, over the past decade or so there has been a massive effort to counter the growing awareness that we never landed on the Moon. This propaganda campaign is ongoing and genuinely scares me because it is as highly coordinated as was the original Apollo Program and the general public is completely oblivious to it. It’s like Déjà vu. The whole thing makes me feel like I’m from a different planet. 
LAST UPDATE: March 6, 2021

This page is dedicated to
Our Youth in the United States of America
May you live to see the dawn of a new era

I feel great compassion for our youth. They never had a chance to decide for themselves if all of this was true. History tells them it is a fact that we landed on the Moon. It is written in books. There are movies, documentaries. Their parents believe. What chance do they have to know the truth? 

This video is for them…

Ama llulla is Inca for “Do not lie.” I’m not lying to you. In fact, I’ve tried to be the most honest person I could be my entire life. I have no desire to deceive or mislead you. Recently, I started accepting donations but I worked on this website for years without any compensation whatsoever. I don’t want you to join a religion, cult, or anything else for that matter. I do not advertise, so I am not trying to sell you anything. I’m just worried about you guys. 

Stars From Space Station – Brilliant Views | Video from the VideoFromSpace YouTube channel


NASA’s Lunar Exploration Program Overview, September 2020, Appendix 7: The Artemis Accords, page 72

In Greek mythology, Artemis is the twin sister of Apollo


Madam, I swear I use no art at all. That he is mad, ’tis true. Tis true, ’tis pity, And pity ’tis ’tis true—a foolish figure, But farewell it, for I will use no art. Mad let us grant him then. And now remains

—William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 2 Scene 2

A very real Propaganda Campaign

For the better part of a decade now, unbeknownst to the American public, there has been a propaganda campaign of staggering proportions to counteract the increasing awareness that the Apollo moon landings not only were faked, but were technically impossible then and now. In this theatre of the absurd, all the promises of “returning” to the moon or landing on Mars are empty. The progeny of Jove know we will not be here in the promised timeframe, which interestingly enough is 2024.

With the Artemis program, NASA will land the first woman and next man on the Moon by 2024, using innovative technologies to explore more of the lunar surface than ever before. We will collaborate with our commercial and international partners and establish sustainable exploration by the end of the decade. Then, we will use what we learn on and around the Moon to take the next giant leap – sending astronauts to Mars.


The dimensions of this campaign and the raw force it exerts on public opinion are as close as I will ever come to living under a communist regime. Anyone who follows my work and understands and believes what is said in the remainder of this page should take this as sure evidence that January 1, 2025, never happens.

NASA is promising something
it knows it cannot deliver.

This is merely part of the propaganda campaign to silence the rising tide of voices questioning whether or not we really landed on the moon. Part of this propaganda campaign is a copyrights violation attack on some exceptionally well done YouTube documentaries, silencing the voices of reason. I shall forever lament the loss of the original Shill Stompers channel and videos such as the one about the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) and Moon Hoax; “What’s Up With Apollo 13?”. They were so exceptionally well done as to leave the watchers feeling stupid for ever having thought we landed on the moon. There is a new Shill Stompers YouTube channel. One assumes it is the same people, but as of this writing, I have not had time to verify this.

Irrefutable Evidence that We Never Landed on the Moon

I claim to have irrefutable evidence that we never landed on the Moon based on the assumption that if Apollo 11 never landed on the Moon, then none of the other Apollo missions landed on the Moon. It is based entirely on a BBC interview with Neil Armstrong and a video of the Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference on September 16, 1969. This evidence is straightforward, non-technical, and not subject to interpretation. 

This evidence has never before been presented
to the public

All I ask of the reader is that you thoughtfully read everything said in the next two subsections and watch all of the videos. 

I am not talking about cameras, photographs, or film. This evidence is based on naked-eye observation of the night sky as recorded by the Apollo 11 astronauts in mp3 recordings and transcripts downloaded from NASA. And I provide the download links so you can verify everything I say. 

Cislunar space is not “deep black”

When I say most people are living in a hypnotic state, I am not exaggerating. What induces this hypnotic state is repetition. You are told over and over again what to think and believe, by so-called scientists, academia, and mainstream media ad nauseam until you stop thinking for yourself, stop questioning. This begins in youth and continues throughout your entire lifetime. It is ceaseless. Right now, right this very moment, I am engaging a part of you in a very deep hypnotic state, one as aggressive as thoughts about what happened in New York City on September, 11, 2001. In so doing, I am walking into a trap. I do so willingly. I know too much to let pride get in my way. Suppose I told you that way out in the country far away from city lights the stars at night are much brighter. Would you believe me? Yes, I think you would. And if I asked you why astronomical observatories are located on mountain tops, I am sure that you could provide me with a reasonable answer. 

The higher you go at night,
the clearer are the stars.

Isn’t this why the Hubble space telescope was launched into low Earth orbit? The International Space Station (ISS) is in low Earth orbit also. Did you know there are windows in the ISS?

There are several windows throughout the ISS, including the Lab nadir window (WORF), the seven windows in the cupola, the window in the Japanese Kibo module, thirteen windows in the Russian Service Module, two in the Russian docking module, and a window in each Soyuz.

Quora, How many windows are on the International Space Station?, Robert Frost, June 9, 2015

Now let me ask you a very important question. Do you think the astronauts in the ISS enjoy watching the stars at night?

Stars from the International Space Station – Oct. 2018 from the NASACrewEarthObs YouTube channel 

Pretty cool, huh? Now I want you to understand that this is an official NASA YouTube channel. Nobody is trying to trick you. Okay? Here is another one of their videos of the stars at night:  

Earth Glow & Stars from the NASACrewEarthObs YouTube channel 

Awesome! I bet the astronauts spend hours just gazing at the stars and thinking how special they are to be on the International Space Station.

Now I want to show you something that should startle you.
If you are one of the billions of true believers and think Neil Armstrong really did walk on the moon, this should give you pause. This clip is from a 1970 interview. The entire interview can be seen in The Three Neil Armstrong Interviews section below.
What you have just seen is the reason why Neil Armstrong never gave another interview until late in his life. As his own children attest, he was not reclusive. NASA put a stop to his interviews after this potentially disastrous cislunar comment.

He risked exposing the entire Apollo Program as the biggest hoax ever perpetrated in the history of mankind, unsurpassed even by the events in New York City on September 11, 2001.

IMAGE CREDIT: A Compelling Case for Developing Cislunar Space Next and Soon brochure on cislunarnext.org.There is no such thing as a “Manned GEO Servicer.” This is a dream at cislunarnext.org. Their goal is to “Recover American leadership in space by creating a cislunar space transportation system.” and their strategy is “Incremental, cumulative steps outward from low Earth orbit with people and machines.”

Cislunar space

Earth’s gravity keeps the Moon in orbit at an average distance of 384,403 km (238,857 mi). The region outside Earth’s atmosphere and extending out to just beyond the Moon’s orbit, including the Lagrangian points, is sometimes referred to as cislunar space.

Wikipedia, Outer space

Cis is from the Latin preposition cis (“on this side of”). Cislunar space by definition includes the low Earth orbit (LEO) of the Hubble space telescope and International Space Station. So now that we are clear on the definition of cislunar space, let us revisit what the young Neil Armstrong had to say about cislunar space in the first and last interview ever recorded of him until late in his life.

Famous Last (interview in his youth) Words
“The sky is deep black when viewed from the Moon, as it is when viewed from cislunar space, the space between the earth and the moon.”
–Neil Armstrong
The Poster Boy

The Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference on September 16, 1969, is the Smoking Gun

Before the 1970 interview discussed in the previous section, there was the Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference on September 16, 1969. The entire press conference interview can be watched at the bottom of this section.

Neil Armstrong: We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface during the televised Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference, 16 September 1969

Transcript at The First Lunar Landing, Part VI, history.nasa.gov or just watch the interview for yourself…

NASA has two cameras filming the press conference. Here is the same scene from both camera perspectives.

Look at these men’s hands. Watch the second video again. Focus on their hands. These are three good men being told to lie in front of the entire world. It’s torture for them. 

At no other time during either the initial presentation or any of the other questions and answers are all three astronauts as nervous and fidgety as they are in the immediate aftermath of this question being asked. What you are seeing here is extreme and a sure sign that both NASA and the astronauts are fully aware that there is a huge risk of exposure is answering such a question.  

Isaiah 29:15
Woe unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from the Lord, and their works are in the dark, and they say, Who seeth us? and who knoweth us?

Luke 12:2
For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known.

These are not shy or bashful men. They are obviously ashamed of something.

History has made it abundantly clear that the astronauts were not sufficiently practiced in answering such questions. Before I show you what no one else on the planet noticed for over half a century from September 16, 1969, to November 15, 2020, let me provide links to the NASA page where this video was downloaded. Here is an image of the page. You can click on it if you want to download the videos for yourself. 

And here are the two download files on my harddrive.

As you can see there are two files. These two video files are totally weird. I will refer to them as the “N” and “Q” files. There are flashes and white screen accompanied by beeps throughout both of them in which there appears to be a discontinuity in the filming, suggesting perhaps they have been improperly edited. The “N” file shows the entire interview and then it starts over at 57:04 minutes. Why? I have no idea. 

and is is somewhat odd because the second, smaller “Q” video file is more or less a duplicate of the first file. They can be synced at 12:44 into the first “N” video and 00:12 into the second “Q” video, which means anytime between 12:44 and 57:04 in “N” you can subtract 12:30 from “N” to find approximately the same location in “Q”. This is an imperfect process because of minor differences between the two videos. I note all important sync times below. I am pretty sure there is nothing in the shorter “Q” video that is not also in “N.” 

add . This makes the first video mreo complete and the one used on this website. Please note that there are precisely 09:10 minutes at the end of this video, which gives (2:28:42 – 09:10 =) 2:19:32 usable video. 

  • FILM QUALITY: “N” is of distinctly better quality than “N” because of the camera positioning. Camera “N” is much closer to both the astronauts and the audience than camber “Q.” For the same reason, the sound quality in “N” is distinctly better.
  • QUESTIONS & ANSWERS CAMERA PERSPECTIVE: One very substantial difference is the camera perspective during questions and answers. Sometimes but not always (mostly towards the beginning of the questions and answers period) camera “N” focuses on the journalist asking the question and sometimes remains on the audience while the astronauts answer. The perspective of camera “Q” never changes. It is always focused on the astronauts, even while the questions are being asked.
  • MISSING SEGMENTS: It should also be noted that for some unknown reason, the questions and answers period in the longer “N” video has been heavily edited and is missing little segments everywhere. It is comparatively very choppy at times compared to the shorter video “Q.”
  • INITIAL SYNC POINT: 12:44 in “N” and 00:12 in “Q”

The damning “We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface” scene begins at 


SPECIAL NOTICE: The date is December 9, 2020. I had to stop working on this section in order to recover from a major formatting fiasco that affected the entire website. I will return to finish it as soon as possible. And, No, I have not yet shared the irrefutable evidence that proves Apollo 11 never landed on the Moon. It is groundbreaking. 

The Three Neil Armstrong Interviews

For the sake of completeness, here are all three of the Neil Armstrong interviews.

Neil Armstrong talks to Patrick Moore, The Sky at Night, BBC 1970

The moon landing at 50: Neil Armstrong in his own words from the 60 Minutes YouTube channel

Interview with Alex Malley, CEO of Certified Practicing Accountants (CPA) of Australia. As of this writing, I cannot determine an exact date for these interviews. Some sources suggest the interview was recorded in 2011, but it apparently was not posted on the CPA Australia website until May of 2012. They are no longer available on that website. See Small step for a man, great get for accountants for an article posted at the time. Neil Armstrong died on August 25, 2012. This is the last recorded interview with him before his death. This section is included for the sake of completeness. I find nothing of interest in this interview.

A final farewell to Neil Armstrong from the CBS News YouTube channel. 

Oh the madness!

He was not a “private man.” He was sequestered for the duration of his life because of the cislunar comment. It was a sad and miserable life full of deception and eventually cost him his wife. 

Janet Shearon Armstrong

Neil Armstrong was special among the Apollo astronauts. He was their poster boy, but for the very same reason he was chosen to play this role, he lacked the requisite sophistry and mental acuity to maintain such an elaborate lie. His boyish nature is clear in the way he defines cislunar space to his audience in the interview video at the top of this page. This was not a sophisticated man.

But the astronauts were not the only ones whose souls were tortured maintaining this monstrous lie. Their wives knew the truth, and they knew what it was doing to their husbands. It changed them in a way I suspect they deeply resented.

This is Neil Armstrong’s former wife, Janet Armstrong, doing what I can only instinctively characterize as flipping the bird to the men who destroyed her husband’s life. It is an act of brazen defiance, and I admire her for it.
Janet Armstrong, wife of Apollo astronaut Neil Armstrong. Whatever is she thinking? Is that not a look of defiance?
The Big Lie
Mankind has never left
low-Earth orbit
Never. Period.
Original cover of 1976 We Never Went to The Moon by Bill Kaysing

Bill Kaysing (a nice pedigree)

Bill Kaysing was surprisingly ahead of his time when he self-published We Never Went to the Moon in 1976, an original copy of which cannot be had at any price. This was a respectable man. According to Wikipedia, “Kaysing served in the United States Navy during World War II as a midshipman, and later attended Navy Officers Training School, and the University of Southern California. He went on, after the war, to receive a B.A. in English literature, in 1949, from the University of Redlands.” The article goes on to say “his writing career involved publishing on a variety of subjects. Kaysing then found work as a technical writer at Rocketdynes jet propulsion laboratory, a division of North American Aviation, in 1956, in the period prior to the development of the Apollo missions. In September 1956, he became a service analyst there, in 1958 a service engineer, and in 1962 a publications analyst. From 1956 to 1963 Kaysing served as head of technical publications for Rocketdyne.” Rocketdyne developed the F-1 engine used in the Saturn V rocket (the main launch vehicle of the Apollo program). He died April 21, 2005, but to this very day there is a Bill Kaysing tribute website

01:37 Clip from Richplanet – New evidence on Stanley Kubrick faking the Apollo Moon landing (full version) on the Robert Ritter YouTube channel

Google books include a copy of We Never Went to the Moon. The 1978 movie Capricorn One was based on Kaysing’s book. It is about a Mars landing the was actually filmed in a studio. 

Did the Apollo astronauts land on the Moon?

The short answer is no. But this subject is now more about American culture than it is about science. Until September 11, 2001, there was nothing even remotely comparable to this deception. It is unquestionably the biggest and boldest lie in the history of mankind, which is why it is so hard for the average person to question. As Wikipedia says on their Big lie page, “The expression was coined by Adolf Hitler, when he dictated his 1925 book Mein Kampf, about the use of a lie so ‘colossal’ that no one would believe that someone ‘could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.’”

The truth is that mankind has never left low-earth orbit, which is to say mankind has never passed through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts. Yet the Apollo Program claims to have done so nine times (18 times if you count coming and going) and to have landed on the Moon seven of those times. This is ludicrous for any thinking individual. Over half a century later, the technology for a human being to survive a passage through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts still does not exist. 

Mankind has never left low-earth orbit. Yet the Apollo Programs claims to have done so nine times (18 times if you count coming and going) and to have landed on the Moon seven of those times. Any thinking individual who applies him or herself to the study of this subject can readily ascertain that not only is this a bald-faced lie, but a human being surviving passage through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts is a technical feat we are incapable of achieving to this very day.

There is way too much evidence against that veracity of the Apollo Moon landings to present all of it. I take a different approach on this webpage by focusing on just two of the many technical impossibilities of the Moon landings: surviving the Van Allen belts and transmitting live television signals from the Moon using the technology available in  1969. But honestly, the inexplicably odd behavior of Neil Armstrong during the Apollo 11 Post Flight Press Conference and throughout the remainder of his life speaks volumes. To bear such a burden for king and country is truly beyond the call of duty. Should we admire and praise him for his willingness to maintain this lie for more than 43 years? When I ask myself this question, I think of Janet Shearon, who divorsed him after 38 years of marriage. 

Since originally writing this page, I have added a third favorite of mine, which is the absence of a crater underneath what was originally designated the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM), but which is now referred to as simply the Apollo Lunder Module. I added this for two reasons. The first is that it does not require a lot of technical background to understand. The other reason is that it amuses me how all the worldly-wise “debunkers” avoid this discussion altogether because there is no possible explanation. None. 

Coronal mass ejection (CME)

The Van Allen radiation belts

The sunspot count was over a hundred. Even if we had the technology to keep the astronauts alive as they pass through the Van Allen belts, we would have waited. The situation is analogous to charging a machine gun in battle. You wait until the enemy is reloading.

Only a handful of people ever mention the fact that attempting to go to the moon at the height of the Solar Cycle 20 maximum would have been suicidal. No sane human being would have even tried this.
The Apollo Program claims to have passed through the Van Allen radiation belts at the height of the Solar Cycle 20 maximum. This makes no sense.

No sane person would even attempt to do this, especially because Solar Cycle 19 saw levels of solar activity not seen in over 10,000 years. I know because it peaked the month before I was born in 1958.

10,000 year sunspot record
10,000 year sunspot record

The sunspot count when “first man” landed on the moon was more than 100. It’s difficult to think of a proper analogy, but charging a machine gun comes readily to mind.

Solar Cycle 20

The following YouTube video very eloquently refers to this as “playing sunspot roulette.”

RUNTIME: 1:31:40
TITLEWhat Happened On the Moon? Part 2 – Environmental Dangers & The Trouble with Rockets
CHANNELUFOTV® The Disclosure Network
POSTED: November 6, 2010
VIEWS: 1,110,636 views as of December 10, 2020

This next guy is a newcomer, but I think his video is a good compilation of NASA personnel (including astronauts) stating plainly that we have never left low Earth orbit because of the radiation hazard.

For non-technical people and skeptics of the worst sort, these very down to Earth, frank admissions on the part of NASA’s own astronauts should appeal to your common sense. That it does not is one of the reasons I argue that people are in a deep hypnotic state.
TITLEWhat will it take for you to finally admit that we never went to the moon?
POSTED: November 5, 2017
VIEWS: 117,829 views as of December 10, 2020

Impossible TV transmissions

The television images from the moon were not real. They were not real. Period. This is seldom discussed, but the size and weight of the batteries necessary to broadcast from the moon alone preclude any possibility whatsoever of live broadcasts from the moon. You will never hear this “debunked.” Never.

…the marvel of modern communication have permitted people around the world to share the excitement of our exploration.

Neil A. Armstrong addressing the House of Representatives, September 16, 1969, retrieved from history.nasa.gov

The following is a clip from a video entitled “Landing on the Moon” in which Thomas Kelly, a GRUMMAN Chief Engineer, explains how the lunar module works.  

“real time”
Oh really?
RUNTIME: 16:57
CHANNELJohn Farpoint 
POSTED: August 7, 2017
VIEWS: 75,532 views as of December 10, 2020
RUNTIME: 18:36
TITLETV From the Moon: Are you INSANE?
POSTED: March 19, 2018
VIEWS: 173,041 views as of December 10, 2020

Yes, but I learned the hard way to always keep copies. Enjoy…

No crater underneath the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM)

This section has yet to be written.

  • SHOW FOOTAGE OF TAKEOFF. This is highly relevant to this section because the ascent engine considerable smaller than landing engine…find in LEM design video This clip is from When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions: Season 1, Episode 3,  Landing the Eagle
  • Also, play footage of rover dust returning immediately to the ground under the weight of Earth’s gravity. This could not be hidden. 
  • Quote astronaut from post-flight interview: “Flying helicopter-like to the surface” Then discuss brownouts with examples from the Afganistan war Brownout (aeronautics) Find official liftoff film and contrast it with much more powerful landing engines

First compare the two propulsion systems in the Lunar Module, the Ascent Propulsion System (APS) and the Descent Propulsion system (DPS).

At 10,500 lbs of thrust, the DPS is three times more powerful than the APS. No watch this clip from an official NASA video very carefully. 

More YouTube Videos

I am always on the lookout for exceptionally well made YouTube videos on this subject. When I find one, I add it to this section. 

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon: The Greatest Government Conspiracy of All Time

2,158,524 views as of November 16, 2020

This is a very popular YouTube video, as good as any documentary you will find anywhere. So when Wikipedia makes derogatory “conspiracy theorist” comments such as the one below, they only confirm what I have known for a very long time now, which is that, at the highest level, they are directly controlled by the progeny of Jove exactly the same as mainstream media.

This Bart Sibrel YouTube was originally released as a full-fledged movie and has its own Wikipedia page.   Bart Sibrel is an American conspiracy theorist who has written, produced, and directed works in support of the false belief that the Apollo moon landings between 1969 and 1972 were staged by NASA under the control of the CIA.

Wikipedia, Bart Sibrel

And yet this is precisely what happened…

“The moon landing were staged by
NASA under the control of the CIA”

To this, I would add only that they were directed by Stanley Kubrick.  

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon from the Bart Sibrel channel:

What Happened on the Moon, Part 1

This video is included for the sake of completeness.  

What Happened On the Moon? – Analysis of the Lunar Photography from the UFOTV® The Disclosure Network channel

A sample of a “Moon rock” brought back from the Apollo 11 mission. (credit upr.org)

The Moon rocks are from 1.86 miles below the Earth’s surface

Of all things, the origin of the moon rocks always bothered because they would be scrutinized by geologists. Then one day I heard this in a YouTube video about the Kola Superdeep Borehole, which is the deepest hole ever drilled into the earth.

Geologists were keen to examine the lunar rock. And some of these geologists were the same people who had been working at Kola. They noticed with astonishment that the composition of the Moon rocks was exactly the same as the composition of the rocks found at the 1.86 mile level below the earth’s surface.

My God, the irony!
The progeny of Jove most likely used rock from their tunnel boring machines to masquerade as moon rocks.

This is a fascinating video. I highly recommend watching all of it.  

Here’s what Hides At The Bottom Of The DEEPEST Hole On EARTH… from the Amazing Stock channel

Stanley Kubrick and 2001: A Space Odyssey

SPECIAL NOTE: This section is in the process of being rewritten. Right now this is material from several other sections that were thrown together. It also lacks the video evidence from 2001: A Space Odyssey.


2001: A Space Odyssey was released on April 3, 1968, which is coincidentally 66 weeks and 6 days before the first Moon landing on July 16, 1969. A mere 1 year, 3 months, and 12 days separate the two events. 

The movie 2001: A Space Odyssey is what enlightened individuals think of as “predictive programming.” It prepared the collective consciousness for the “reality” of a moon landing that never happened. Beyond that, 2001: A Space Odyssey was instrumental in developing the cinematic tools necessary to make the gullible masses believe in the poorly executed Apollo Program charade.

Predictive programming is not a game. It is an almost metaphysical method of altering our reality. The operative word in “predictive programming” is programming, and the meaning is as follows:  

Kubrick had a deep respect for the intelligence of his audience. He was an extraordinary man in this regard. When I saw a flag waving in a windowless room with a closed door at the start of 2001: A Space Odyssey, I instantly knew what it meant. He had already decided one of the ways he would tell us that the Moon landings were faked.

    Get ready to learn a radical truth. Stanley Kubrick knew much more than most people realize. And he knew it sooner than most people believe. “2001: A Space Odyssey” was practice for faking the Apollo moon landings. He already knew then “what’s going to happen” (a quote from the end of the movie). 

Stanley Kubrick planted a few bombshells in 2001: A Space Odyssey including a United States flag waving inside of a closed room and helmet visors reflecting things they should not.

What I am telling you is that NASA had already told Stanley Kubrick everything before he even began filing 2001: A Space Odyssey was practice for filming the moon landings. In fact, I am sure the financing for this movie was not only arranged for him but that he also had a very generous, if not practically unlimited budget. Furthermore, Kubrick had already decided at least some of the tricks he would use to communicate to a thinking audience that what they were seeing was a staged landing on the Moon, not the real thing.

The waving flag inside of a closed room in 2001: A Space Odyssey shocked me the first time I saw it. I knew immediately what it signified. He was telling us even then, “I have been contracted to fake the moon landings for NASA.” We just would not be able to hear him until many years later when the first person realized that a flag on the surface of the moon should not be waving.

And was waving. The progeny of Jove are in the middle of a campaign to defend the Apollo Program. Part of that campaign very specifically addresses the waving flag. Don’t buy it. I highly value the following video because it th oroughly documents the high-level of NASA involvement in the production of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

  “Richplanet – New evidence on Stanley Kubrick faking the Apollo Moon landing (full version)” from the Robert Ritter YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0e8M22wU4w The more I study Stanley Kubrick, the more I think he was another Manly P. Hall. Both men were killed for talking too much. My point is that Kubrick knew everything. He was an insider. He knew “what’s going to happen.” None of his subsequent movies come as close to him revealing the whole truth of what is about to happen when compared to 2001:A SpaceOdyssey.               I can assure you that you’ve never heard this before because I was the first person to notice it. In his movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, the start of the movie is so bizarre that I just knew he was telling us something profoundly important. It took me a few minutes to find it. It was in the timing. The music reaches a very loud crescendo and then suddenly stops. The time is 00:04:33, as in “I am making this movie for 33” or for the progeny of Jove. Stanley Kubrick was eventually killed for doing this, for his compulsive need to use his art to tell us what was really happening. His most bold move in this regard has regrettably never been noticed. It starts at 00:41:06 in the same movie and lasts until 00:45:36, a 4:30-minute scene in which his brilliance as a human being was wasted on us. The scene opens with a cameraman dressed in a totally weird looking plaid suit so as to get your attention. You’ll see this plaid again on Jack Nicholson in The Shining. The camera is initially pointed at the audience. So as to emphasize the peculiarity of this scene, some of the last dialogue is  

Oh yes. As some of you already know, the council has requested that formal security oaths be obtained in writing from everyone who has any knowledge of this event.  

The “event” to which Kubrick is referring is the faked moon landing. The progeny of Jove have already hired him to fake the moon landing and he has committed himself in writing to secrecy. 2001: A Space Odyssey was his preparation for that work. It was also intended to prepare the public for the moon landings. How do I know all of this? Because of the 4:30 scene I am discussing now. Why is there a cameraman filming a top-secret meeting in which all of the attendees are sworn to secrecy? It’s Kubrick! The cameraman is Kubrick. Something profound is about to happen. Something everyone missed. Sometimes I think The Shining grew out of Kubrick’s frustration that we missed what happens in this scene. It is so obvious in retrospect. Kubrick has already figured out how he is going to expose the moon landings as a fake. He has several devices in mind, but the flags in this scene are his most important. Even at this early date, Kubrick intends to make the flag on the moon wave, something that should be clearly impossible because there is no atmosphere on the moon. He is thinking way ahead. That is what this whole scene is about. It is being filmed in a closed room (which also happens to be on the moon). There is no breeze, nothing to cause the flag to wave in this secen either. Yet it does. This man truly is a genius. The scene discusses a “cover story” which is clearly a reference to the faked moon landings. Here is an excerpt. You should imagine this is Stanley Kubrick talking to you about the faked moon landings because that is exactly what he is doing.  

I found this cover story personally embarrassing myself. However, I accept the need for absolute secrecy in this and I hope you will, too. Now I’m sure you’re all aware of the extremely grave potential for cultural shock and social disorientation contained in this present situation. If the facts were prematurely and suddenly made public without adequate preparation and conditioning.

  At 00:41:45 after Dr. Halvorsen has reached the podium and is standing behind it, the United States flag starts waving. Kubrick wasn’t taking any chances; it waves more than just a little, more than could possibly be explained by the draft of a passing man. And then as if to emphasize what just happened, the blue flag with the white star in the other corner at the front of the room starts inexplicably waving. In fact, if you watch carefully, both flags keep moving throughout this 4:30-minute scene. Why did the flag move? Perhaps it was a disturbance in the air caused by Dr. Halvorsen walking by (even though Kubrick has made sure the timing of the flag moving does not support this theory). So you might ask, does the flag move when Dr. Floyd walks by it? This is where Stanley Kubrick is having a little fun and speaking directly to you. It is in some small way what I call an “anti-cipher” in that he is letting you know that he did indeed move the flag on purpose. The answer is you’ll never know. Dr. Halvorsen blocks the camera’s view of the flag at this critical juncture in the scene. Now you might think all of this is conjecture, meaningless prattle. It’s okay. I understand. But if you feel this way you really should stop reading my website. There’s nothing in it for you. The things I am saying are real. And Stanley Kubrick died because of this. He was murdered. So was Christ Jesus.

Image from We Never Went to The Moon by Bill Kaysing, 1976 

The Use of Front Screen Projection in 2001: A Space Odyssey and Apollo Program Moon Scenes

This is now an old technology replaced by “green screens” and computers. However, at the time, the use of front screen projection was pioneered by Stanley Kubrick in 2001: A Space Odyssey. The first person to notice the “line between the set and screen,” which is the telltale sign of front screen projection, was Bill Kaysing in his book We Never Went to the Moon, published in 1976.

Jay Weidner discusses the use of front screen projection in 2001: A Space Odyssey and in official NASA images extensively in his film Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick. This is some of his best work. 

Slow Motion: An Important Example of Audience Programming

The thing Stanley Kubrick did in both 2001: A Space Odyssey and the Moon landings that history will probably remember the most is his use of slow motion. Some future generation of children will look at these images in bewilderment and ask their parents how we could have ever believed something so bizarre. I credit Jay Weidner for making the connection between NASA film and what Stanley Kubrick did in 2001: A Space Odyssey. This clip is from his film Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick.

Frederick I. Ordway III, left, Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick on the set of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

An estimated 50 Companies and Major Corporations provided material support for the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey. Why?

The following clip from How Kubrick made 2001: A Space Odyssey on the CinemaTyler YouTube channel should be thought-provoking. It features Frederick Ordway who the New York Times characterized as “a top official at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, working closely with the rocket scientist Wernher von Braun.” Frederick Ordway was also the “chief technical consultant and scientific adviser” for 2001: A Space Odyssey.  The New York Times article, written after his death in 2014, goes on to say “he was one of Mr. Kubrick’s most essential advisers, roaming from NASA offices to the corporate headquarters of companies like General Electric.”

Here is another take on the high profile individuals and corporations involved in the production of 2001: A Space Odyssey. This is Carl James, author of Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda. He also maintains a blog named The Truth Seeker’s Guide.

Clip from Richplanet – New evidence on Stanley Kubrick faking the Apollo Moon landing (full version) on the Robert Ritter YouTube channel

Why are so many companies and major corporations cooperating in the production of a supposedly commercial film?

The answer is simple. These very same companies would earn countless millions producing the sequel, which history remembers as the Apollo Program.

One common objection to the Apollo program being faked and never leaving low Earth orbit is the fact that this has been kept secret for half a century. From where I am sitting, I look at the fact that this has been kept secret for so long, and especially the fact that Russia and China have never publically said anything, as evidence of the true extent to which the progeny of Jove control the world in which we live. From that perspective, the greatest lie of all time, including the current massive propaganda campaign to squelch the rising tide of voices screaming, “this could never have happened,” is both instructive and somewhat intimidating.

How Kubrick made 2001: A Space Odyssey

I find these seven videos about How Kubrick made 2001: A Space Odyssey from the CinemaTyler YouTube channel to be extremely well done. Of course, in this context, this is also a study of how Kubric made the Moon scenes for NASA. Several clips from these videos are used in the sections above. You can watch all seven as a playlist on the CinemaTyler channel.

How Kubrick made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 1: The Dawn of Man

How Kubrick made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 2: The Floyd Section

How Kubrick Made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 3: The Lunar Surface (TMA-1)

How Kubrick Made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 4: Jupiter Mission [A]

How Kubrick Made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 5: Jupiter Mission [B]

How Kubrick Made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 6: Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite [A]

How Kubrick Made 2001: A Space Odyssey – Part 7: Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite [B]

The Shining

This section showcases the work of Jay Weidner in his film Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick. But, with all due respect, no one, including Mr. Weidner, has ever noticed the most important scene in The Shining

This is the scene where the family is driving to Jack’s new job in the mountains. It ends with this visual in which the ladder is a capital letter A and the two columns to the right of the ladder are ones, making a very subtle, but unmistakable reference to A11 or Apollo 11. I say unmistakable because of the force of the scene immediately prior.

Credit 2001: A Space Odyssey – What Did Stanley Kubrick Know? on the Shaking My Head Productions YouTube channel for noticing this

You only need to open your eyes to what is happening in this movie. Most people can’t see it, but I assure you it is very real.

He saw it on the television

Listen to the music. The music always tells you what the director is thinking. “You see, it’s okay. He saw it on the television” is Kubric telling you that as a people we accept everything we see on the television as gospel, as acceptable, as the truth. In this case, the mind of a young child has no problem accepting the idea of cannibalism because “he saw it on the television.” Likewise, we all accepted the Moon landings because we saw it on the television. That made it real for us. It’s a powerful message from a man who knew better. 

Matthew 13:13

Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.


Let me stop here and make a few timely remarks on what is happening in The Shining and in defense of Jay Weidner. Stanley Kubrick is famous for meticulously planning everything on a movie set down to the last detail. Nothing is there by accident. Movies are not books. The conveyance of meaning is not limited to the dialogue between characters. Every scene in a Kubrick movie is visually communicating something. Moreover, he is something of a cinematic genius. To pretend that his movies have only a surface meaning is sheer stupidity.

Jay Weidner

Stanley Kubrick’s Contract Scene in The Shining

This analysis is the work of Jay Weidner. However, I fully endorse it and in my opinion, his analysis of The Shining is dead-on in every respect. Jay Weidner deserves great praise for seeing what Kubric was really portraying in this movie. All I can add to it is to state what seems obvious to me, which is that the entire movie is about the contract scene. This is Stanly Kubrick’s apology to the American public for his participation in the Apollo Program fraud. I think it was a genuine apology.

Here is the trailer for Jay Weidner’s film entitled Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick in which he analyzes The Shining

I am going to present his analysis on three levels so that you can decide how far you want to go with this. The first is just the contract scene taken directly from the movie, nothing else. After that is an excerpt from a YouTube video which can be thought of as a Reader’s Digest or Cliff Notes for Jay Weidner’s full analysis of The Shining. And then finally the excerpt from Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick Part 1 which is the full analysis.

The contract scene has two principal elements: the opening of the scene in which the wife discovers that Jack has been typing the same sentence for months and the contract rant. However, it is important to keep in mind that the main character Jack, who portrays Stanley Kubrick in this movie, is whacked with a baseball bat by his wife at the end of this scene and tumbles down a staircase. All of which is to say that this is the highpoint or crescendo of the movie. This is what it is all about. 

Kubrick is deliberately using an old fashion typewriter font in which the number 1 and the small letter l are indistinguishable.

A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All = Apollo 11

We know this in part because it is being typed on this Adler typewriter

Adler is German for eagle as in “The Eagle has landed”

But also because of a lot of other props Jay Weidner so thoughtfully inventories.

The most important of which is Danny’s sweater.

Here then is the 04:03 minute opening of the contract scene.

What is Stanley Kubric saying about his involvement in the Apollo Program?  Why does Jack lose his mind in this scene? The answer is because the Apollo program lasted for nine years from 1963 to 1972 (which incidentally, pretty much captured the entirety of my childhood). Filming for 2001: A Space Odyssey began December 29, 1965, and there is more than adequate evidence that Kubric was already involved with NASA by that time. (See my discussion of all of the major corporations involved in the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey above). So you can figure that Stanley Kubric was involved with the Apollo Program in some capacity for the entire nine years.

But he did begin producing film until Apollo 11, so the very minimum he was filming for NASA is for four years starting from early 1969 through the end of 1972. By comparison, according to Wikipedia, filming for 2001: A Space Odyssey lasted less than two and a half years from December 29, 1965, until March of 1968. More important in the context of “Jack” losing his mind in The Shining, Stanley Kubrick went directly from filming 2001: A Space Odyssey to filming for the Apollo Program. There most certainly was not a break between the two. Which means…

He worked continuously for six
years from 1966 through 1972. 
He was exhausted.

And here is the 47-second contract rant. This is what the whole movie is about. As you watch this, keep in mind the wife’s plea “Oh Jack, what are you talking about?” is an invitation from Stanley Kubrick to contemplate the real meaning of this scene.

For those of you not interested in watching the full 32:33 minute Jay Weidner presentation of this subject, here is the condensed version.

04:32 minute clip from 2001: A Space Odyssey – What Did Stanley Kubrick Know? on the Shaking My Head Productions YouTube channel

And finally, here is the full 32:33 minute Jay Weidner analysis of The Shining.

Excerpt from Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick Part 1 on the SacredMysteriesTV YouTube channel. Note that in all of the clips from The Shiningthe video soundtrack is badly out of sync. This is true no matter where you watch the full film including on Amazon prime

The 237,000 miles to the Moon problem

Max Fisher of The Atlantic who wrote an article entitled The Shining’ = Confession to Moon Landing Hoax on February 1, 2020, in which he makes a number of snide remarks including the following:

WHY A KEY LABELED ‘ROOM 237’ PROVES IT: “Because the average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 237,000 miles.”


Weidner takes a lot of flak for the 237,000 miles to the Moon thing. If you listen to his version of the story, he is fully aware of this issue and says the data available to Stanley Kubrick in 1980 was that the Moon was 237,000 miles away.

At the time that Kubrick faked the Apollo Moon landings, it was common knowledge in the textbooks and the scientific work that the Moon was 237,000 miles away from the Earth. This is the figure Stanley was working with, and that is why he changed the room from 217 to 237.

Jay Weidner in Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets Hidden in the Films of Stanley Kubrick

Casual critics who jump on the 237,000 miles from the Moon criticism bandwagon ignore the focus on the door key. It is artistic. It is deliberate. And it is for a reason. I like Jay Weidner’s “Moon Room” also. As I said at the beginning of this section, I think his analysis is dead-on. And I find no reason to doubt his research into the 237,000 miles he says Stanly Kubrick was working with at the time he made The Shining 40 years ago. Here is the relevant scene.

Carl James specifically names the American Heritage Science Dictionary as the source for the 237,000 miles to the Moon. 

Clip from Richplanet – New evidence on Stanley Kubrick faking the Apollo Moon landing (full version) on the Robert Ritter YouTube channel

How much did Stanley Kubrick know?

I want to finish my analysis of 2001: A Space Odyssey and The Shining by pointing out something others have noticed. The main character in 2001: A Space Odyssey is David Bowman which sounds a lot like Archer. Archer is another name for the Sagittarius constellation, the arrow of which Dr. Paul LaViolette has shown is pointing at the center of the galaxy. There is also what Jay Weidner calls an “exploding galaxy” in one of the final scenes. I missed this.

And of course, 2001: A Space Odyssey was released on April 3, 1968, which is something I discuss in the section entitled 1943 and Active Seyfert Galaxies on page № 28. A Date with Destiny. When all of this is combined with Stanley Kubrick’s choice of the name Bowman for the main character, this brings up the question of how much did Stanley Kubrick really know. It would seem to me that he knows everything

It is difficult for me to believe that the progeny of Jove would not tell Kubrick the whole story in order to properly motivate him and so that he fully understood the consequences of breaking his oath of secrecy. I find it equally difficult to imagine Kubrick would not have insisted on knowing everything. So lets us assume he did. 

This would throw a whole new light on the choice of Stephen King’s novel The Shining and it’s room 217. I am thinking of course of page № 23. The Great Wonder was an Asterism on September 23, 2017 (923). And the Going-to-the-Sun Road in the Rockies could be associated with the vault profound as Virgil and I call it. I don’t want to make too much of this, but the choice of the name Bowman in 2001: A Space Odyssey strikes me as very deliberate. 

Apollo 13

Apollo 13 was the final insult to our intelligence. I want to discuss it at great length at some future date. Moon Hoax; “What’s Up With Apollo 13?” from the Shill Stompers channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPXYw5uc2u0 What is the truth? The highly experienced astronaut in the following videos says it is -250 F in the shade and +250 F in the sun. Astronaut Chris Hadfield Debunks Space Myths | WIRED from the WIRED channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6rHHnABoT8

James E. Webb, second NASA Administrator

James Webb was the 66th United States Secretary of the Navy. This caught my attention immediately because under no circumstances whatsoever would the 66th United States Secretary of the Navy be anything other than a progeny of Jove. So I did some investigation and was not disappointed. Do you want to see one of the faces of the progeny of Jove, a Ћinker to be precise? They are real people, more real than perhaps you will ever know. 

Jim Webb

At least at first, I was totally confused to learn that James Webb had been appointed by JFK to be the second NASA Administrator on February 14, 1961. I’ve got this guy pegged as not only a Ћinker but as perhaps a leader among them. How can he be part of the Apollo program, one of the grandest deceptions of all time? The possibility presented a challenge to my whole belief structure. So I was forced to stop and delve into this man’s past. Wikipedia has this one terse little sentence; “Webb was a Freemason.[18]I followed that link for a fuller explanation.

The James Webb Space Telescope takes its name from the man who shaped NASA, Freemason James Edwin Webb.

Webb, James Edwin (1906-1992) Born in Tally Ho, North Carolina, USA, James Webb served as a pilot in the US Marine Corps, 1930-1932. With qualifications in education and law, he became variously a lawyer, Barrister, vice-President of Sperry Gyroscope Company, director of the Bureau of the Budget within the Executive Office of President Truman (see above), and Under Secretary of State.

James Webb oversaw the NASA administration during the Apollo moon landing missions.

When, in 1961, Webb was approached by President John F. Kennedy to head up the fledgling NASA organization as their ‘Administrator’, James Webb was originally reluctant to accept the post. Webb felt his background was money not science, and considered that a person with a background in aeronautical science would be more appropriate. President Kennedy disagreed, insisting that the role was not a scientific one but rather policy-based with a strong fiscal element – and adeptly won Webb over. It proved an astute choice as Webb went on to adroitly steer NASA through its most exciting early phase.

Under his direction, NASA launched 75 space science missions; including Project ‘Apollo‘, the Orbiting Solar Observatory, and the ‘Explorer‘ series of astronomical satellites – building the foundation for the most successful period of space exploration in history. Until October 1968, James Webb politicked, coaxed, cajoled, and maneuvered for NASA in Washington. As a long-time Washington insider, he was a master at bureaucratic politics. In the end, through a variety of methods, Administrator Webb built a seamless web of political liaisons that brought continued support for, and resources to, accomplish the Apollo moon landing within the 10-year schedule President Kennedy had announced on the 25th May 1961.

It has been said that James Webb, a mere “administrator”, did more to progress modern science than any qualified scientist ever could. The planned replacement for the orbiting Hubble Telescope, the New Generation Space Telescope was renamed the James Webb Space Telescope, in his honor.

James Webb was a Brother in University Lodge No. 408, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

I checked to see is when the Apollo program first claimed to leave low Earth orbit because James Webb resigned from NASA on October 7, 1968, and his reason for doing so was highly questionable. 

On March 31, President Johnson surprised the nation by announcing that he would not run for re-election.   NASA Administrator James E. Webb, a close ally of Johnson, didn’t want to stay on until a new President was inaugurated in 1969.  Webb announced his resignation in October, thus Paine served as Acting Administrator by the time Apollo 8 circled the Moon. 

50 years ago, on the way to the Moon…

This is not the kind of man who would offer such a reason for leaving. What I see happening here is a Ћinker who has learned the whole Apollo program is a charade and who does not want to be a part of the lie, so he leaves before the first claim to leave low Earth orbit. 

Now if James Webb is a Ћinker, his resignation date would be meaningful. It almost has to be given the significance of what is happening. 

Operation Paperclip

NASA inherited its original workforce from Operation Paperclip and shortly thereafter became the driving force behind the Apollo program. Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels inspired the “Big Lie”? From day one these high-ranking NAZI military officers and scientists owed their lives to the people I call the progeny of Jove. There can be no doubt whatsoever that NASA is and always has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of the progeny of Jove (the CIA at that time). Everything they do or say is of necessity suspect.

RUNTIME: 57:02
TITLEAnnie Jacobsen, “Operation Paperclip”
CHANNELPolitics and Prose
POSTED: March 15, 2013
VIEWS4,349,071 views (as of May 26, 2021)