- Did the Apollo Program Succeed in Landing on the Moon
- The Van Allen Belts
- Size and Weight of Batteries
- A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon
- 2001: A Space Odyssey was Stanley Kubrick practicing for the Faked Moon Landings
- Exhaustive Documentaries
- Origin of the Moon Rocks
- The Devil is in the Details
- The Debunkers
This page is part of the “ESCAPING THE HYPNOTIC STATE” sequence
- № 1. Our Entirely Fabricated Reality
- № 2. Conspiracy Theories
- № 3. False Flag Attacks
- № 4. JFK
- № 5. Moon Landings (1969 – 1972)
- № 6. Global Warming
- № 7. September 11, 2001 (9/11)
I could not write this website without providing a path out of the deep hypnotic state. These seven pages are that path. The willingness, however, must be yours.
Did the Apollo Program Succeed in Landing on the Moon
We know the moon landings were faked for two very simple reasons: the Van Allen belts and the size of the batteries that would be required to transmit a live signal from the moon to the earth. The latter is often overlooked.
Honestly though, the astronauts themselves reveal the truth. Maintaining such a huge lie is hard on the soul.
This image including the link to Encyclopedia Britannia has now been forcefully added to every YouTube about the Apollo program, including even those “debunking” the “conspiracy theory.” This is essentially a threat to censor this content. You can say all the bad things you want about Google, but nowhere on the Internet is there a community that has enjoyed as much freedom of speech as YouTube. If it goes, I fear individual websites such as this one will be next. Therefore, I think it is time I spoke out on the subject of the faked Moon landings.
The Van Allen Belts
The sunspot count was over a hundred. Even if we had the technology to pass through the Van Allen belts, we would have waited. The situation is analogous to charging a machine gun in battle. You wait until they are reloading.
Only a handful of people ever mention the fact that attempting to go to the moon at the height of the Solar Cycle 20 maximum would have been suicidal. No sane human being would have tried this.
The Apollo Program claims to have landed on the moon at the height of Solar Cycle 20. This makes no sense. No sane person would even attempt to do this, especially because Solar Cycle 19 saw levels of solar activity not seen is over 10,000 years.
I know because it peaked the month before I was born in 1958.
The sunspot count when “first man” landed on the moon was more than 100. It’s difficult to think of a proper analogy, but charging a machine gun comes readily to mind.
The following “What Happened On the Moon? Part 2 – Environmental Dangers & The Trouble with Rockets” from the UFOTV® The Disclosure Network channel very eloquently refers to this as “playing sunspot roulette.”
This guy is a new comer, but I think his video is a good compilation of NASA personnel (including astronauts) stating plainly that we have never left low Earth orbit because of the radiation danger.
Size and Weight of Batteries
This is seldom discussed, but the size and weight of the batteries necessary to broadcast from the moon alone preclude any possibility whatsoever of live broadcasts from the moon. You will never hear this “debunked.”Never.
“JOE FRANTZ regarding NASA & Moon Landing Hoax: ‘IMPOSSIBLE TO BROADCAST THAT SIGNAL FROM THE MOON'” from the John Farpoint YouTube channel:
“TV From the Moon: Are you INSANE?” from the MrThriveAndSurvive channel:
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon
This YouTube is actually a full blown movie with its own Wikipedia entry. Before watching it, I urge you to watch this interview with its producer Bart Sibrel. The interviewer was a true believer in the moon landings, that is until he met Bart Sibrel. It starts slow but is well worth the wait.
“A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” from the Bart Sibrel channel:
2001: A Space Odyssey was Stanley Kubrick practicing for the Faked Moon Landings
Get ready to learn a radical truth. Stanley Kubrick knew much more than most people realize. And he knew it sooner than most people believe. “2001: A Space Odyssey” was practice for faking the Apollo moon landings. He already knew then “what’s going to happen” (a quote from the end of the movie). None of his subsequent movies come as close to him revealing the truth of what is about to happen. Of course, I am referring to The Shinning, which got him killed. But long before that
Stanley Kubrick planted a few bombshells in 2001: A Space Odyssey including a United States flag waving inside of a closed room and helmet visors reflecting things they should not.
What I am telling you is that NASA had already told Stanley Kubrick everything before he even began filing 2001: A Space Odyssey was practice for filming the moon landings. In fact, I am sure the financing for this movie was not only arranged for him but that he also had a very generous, if not practically unlimited budget. Furthermore, Kubrick had already decided at least some of the tricks he would use to communicate to a thinking audience that what they were seeing was a staged landing on the Moon, not the real thing.
The waving flag inside of a closed room in 2001: A Space Odyssey shocked me the first time I saw it. I knew immediately what it signified. He was telling us even then, “I have been contracted to fake the moon landings for NASA.” We just would not be able to hear him until many years later when the first person realized that a flag on the surface of the moon should not be waving.
And was waving. The progeny of Jove are in the middle of a campaign to defend the Apollo Program. Part of that campaign very specifically addresses the waving flag. Don’t buy it.
Despite its name, the following video includes a very good (“best of breed”) analysis of The Shinning. Pay special attention to the part about the contract. If you can hear Stanley Kubrick’s voice speaking directly to you about his contract to fake the moon landings, then I think you have graduated from this module in your effort to escape the deep hypnotic state. You just have to let it be real. You must think for yourself.
“2001: A Space Odyssey – What Did Stanley Kubrick Know?” from the Shaking My Head Productions channel:
Now as for the movie The Shinning, nobody understands the room 237 thing.
This change was done to bring attention to the original room number 217 in the book. Stanley Kubrick added 20 as if to say “there’s a zero missing after the two.” All of this is pointing to the year 2017. This has nothing to do with the distance to the moon. That is pure speculation. See also the № 23. 2017 versus 2018 page.
I highly value the following video because it th oroughly documents the high-level of NASA involvement in the production of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
“Richplanet – New evidence on Stanley Kubrick faking the Apollo Moon landing (full version)” from the Robert Ritter YouTube channel:
The more I study Stanley Kubrick, the more I think he was another Manly P. Hall. Both men were killed for talking too much. My point is that Kubrick knew everything. He was an insider. He knew “what’s going to happen.” None of his subsequent movies come as close to him revealing the whole truth of what is about to happen when compared to 2001:A SpaceOdyssey.
Kubrick is telling us what to expect. And it is “something wonderful.” Mankind will survive the Ekpyrosis, and the “gods” will return. Our skies will be full of heavenly bodies so close as to make the survivors think they have died and gone to heaven.
These videos require a real time commit. This first one has a runtime of 5:10:38 (yes, that’s over five hours).
“Moon Landings Hoax Day Collection – Dec 14, 2017” from the Taboo Conspiracy YouTube channel:
The following is a three part video.
“What Happened On the Moon? – Analysis of the Lunar Photography” from the UFOTV® The Disclosure Network channel
“What Happened On the Moon? Part 2 – Environmental Dangers & The Trouble with Rockets” from the UFOTV® The Disclosure Network channel
“What Happened On the Moon? Part 3 – Environmental Dangers & The Trouble with Rockets” from the UFOTV® The Disclosure Network channel
This video is not available, or at least I cannot find it on the UFOTV® The Disclosure Network channel.
Origin of the Moon Rocks
Of all things, the origin of the moon rocks always bothered because they would be scrutinized by geologists. Then one day I heard this in a YouTube video about the Kola Superdeep Borehole, which is the deepest hole ever drilled into the earth.
Geologist were keen to examine the lunar rock. And some of this geologist were the same people who had been working at Kola. They noticed with astonishment the the composition of the moon rocks was exactly the same as the composition of the rocks found at the 1.86 mile level below the earth’s surface.
My God, the irony. The progeny of Jove have used rock from the “vault profound” to masquerade as moon rocks.
This video is set to begin at the point at which the commentator says what I quoted in the above excerpt. It is a fascinating watch though. So I suggest rewinding it to the start.
The Devil is in the Details
This section was inspired by a new (to me at least) YouTube channel. This guy is unstoppable. I just wish I could show him that the faked moon landing is only a small part of what is happening. Nevertheless, I expect this section to grow over time as I review more and ore of his and other videos by people who are taking an ever more detailed look at the biggest lie ever told in the history of mankind.
The Apollo Lunar Module
Upon close inspection, what was lunar module (LM), or what was originally called the lunar excursion module and is therefore sometimes referred to as the LEM, looks like a poorly executed high school science project.
Yet another WTF moment
Look great at a distant, no? Wait to you see this thing up close. My God the madness of the Apollo program never stops. If you can read this page and watch all these videos and still believe we landed on the moon, God help you because I cannot. And if we did not land on the moon, you need to consider everything I am telling you on this website. Trust me, the faked moon landing are a big nothing in comparison to what is about to happen.
Just for the sake of balance. Here are some of the “debunkers” videos.
“Moon Hoax Theory dead – killed by rabbit!” from the BertieSlack YouTube channel:
“Moon Landings Faked? Filmmaker Says Not! | Video” from the VideoFromSpace YouTube channel:
This last one just kills me. Just enough resolution to see something, but not enough to determine without and shadow of a doubt. Why? Google Earth works better than the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.