Genesis 6:4 (DE-EMPHASIZE RELIGIOUS CONNECTION)
Dinaric skulls in Europe and Middle East (related to elongated skulls in Peru)
They are described as a powerful people of great stature “like the height of the cedars” (Amos 2:9) who had occupied the land east and west of the Jordan. The height and strength mentioned in Amos 2:9 has led some Christian scholars, including Orville J. Nave, who wrote the classic Nave’s Topical Bible, to refer to the Amorites as “giants”.
This guy is all over the map but at 49:07 he attributes the development of gematria and advanced mathematics to the Amorites (original inhabitants of Jerusalem?).
search giants in bookmarks
Cro-Magnon was earth before the Polar configuration broke apart (and hence very stable for many hundreds of thousands of year). Everything after is evolution
What is the relationship between Cro-Magnon and Dinarics? Compare skulls.
search “Cro-Magnon giants”
Who are the giants? The giants are us before the end of the last world. That is to say, we are descended from the giants. When Earth was in the polar configuration, inside the magnetosphere of Proto-Saturn, David Talbott tells us that Earth’s gravity was much less. This is what made life for the dinosaurs possible, and it is why we grew to be so tall. Some folks think we are not from this planet because we have so many lower back problems. They’re partially right. The Earth in the polar configuration was very different than the Earth on which we live now. We have lower back problems because we are still adjusting to the increase in gravity. There were “giants in those days“ because many survived the destruction of 9500 BC when Saturn exploded and pelted Earth with hot plasma. The following millennia gave birth to us. We are the runts. We still have back problems because we are still adjusting to this new gravity. We are smaller because the gravity outside of Proto-Saturn’s magnetosphere is much greater. Being a giant outside of Proto-Saturn’s magnetosphere was no advantage. It was a liability. Very few are living today, but they are still here. I saw one at a gas station while living in Arkansas.
This is why the Freemasons buried all the evidence of the giant skeletons deep in the Smithsonian. They didn’t want us to know about our past because we might start asking questions about our future.
MAKE SURE THE ABOVE PICTURE IS NOT ONE OF THE FAKES FROM THE CONTEST SPOKEN ABOUT IN THE YOUTUBE VIDEO BELOW. TO BE SAFE, REPLACE IT WITH A SCREEN SHOT FROM THE VIDEO.
CUT ‘N PASTE
The importance of the “giant” skeletons being found on or near the surface cannot be overstated. It means that the giants died recently, during or not long after the well-documented destruction of 9500 BC. If they were already in the ground at that time, they would be lost to us. This logic of the giant skeletons at or near the surface pointing to a relatively recent breakup of the polar configuration is quite simple and easy to follow. It is at the core of my strong protest that we not only accept David Talbott’s conclusions that there at one time existed a totally different configuration of the planets in our solar system, but we must date when the breakup of that configuration occurred in order to understand what is about to happen.
CHALLENGE THE “DIFFERENT RACE” COMMENT IN THE VIDEO.FIND EVIDENCE THAT THEY EXISTED ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Now combine that with this
And what you have is hat the mounds are bunkers of for the giants. Combine both of these with the work of Carl Munck and you must start to ask if all of the ancients were not giants.